seminars:alge:alge_fall2015
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| seminars:alge:alge_fall2015 [2016/01/26 19:38] – created alex | seminars:alge:alge_fall2015 [2018/01/11 00:34] (current) – mazur | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ~~META: | ||
| + | * **September 1**\\ Organizational Meeting | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **September 8**\\ < | ||
| + | its properties, including its relation to the covering number. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **September 15**\\ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **September 22**\\ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **September 29**\\ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **October 6**\\ < | ||
| + | |||
| + | Recently there has been interest in the nature of these lattices. I will review some of the properties of the Chermak-Delgado lattice. Then as time allows, I will describe some of these developments as presented in [1,2,4,6]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | References: | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. Brewster, Hauck and Wilcox, Groups whose Chermak-Delgado lattice is a chain. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2. Brewster, Hauck and Wilcox, Quasi-Antichain Chermak-Delgado Lattices of finite groups. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3. Chermak and Delgado, A measuring argument for finite groups. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 4. Cocke, Subnormality and the Chermak-Delgado Lattice, (private communication) | ||
| + | |||
| + | 5. Isaacs, Finite Group Theory. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 6. McCulloch, Chermak-Delgado simple groups. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **October 13**\\ | ||
| + | An orthant (of the orthogonal integral lattice) $L\subseteq \mathbb Z^n$ is the image of the standard orthant $\mathbb ℕ^n$ | ||
| + | under an affine-orthogonal transformation. And a permutation $p: S\longrightarrow S$ of a subset $S\subseteq \mathbb Z^n$ is | ||
| + | piecewise-Euclidean-isometric (pei), if $S$ is a disjoint union of finitely many orthants, $S = \bigcup_{i}L_i$, | ||
| + | each of which $p$ restricts to an isometric embedding $L_i\rightarrow S$. I will talk about the group | ||
| + | $\text{pei}(S)$ of all | ||
| + | pei-permutations of various subsets $S$ and its subgroup $\text{pet}(S)$ of all piecewise-Eucliden-translation | ||
| + | permutations. In the case when $S$ consists of the lattice points on the union of $n$ positive coordinate | ||
| + | axes then $\text{pet}(S)$ is the Houghton group $H_n$. | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is joint work with Heike Sach: we prove finiteness properties of some pei- and pet- groups, | ||
| + | and have, as a consequence, | ||
| + | |||
| + | An interesting point is that prominent groups like Richard Thompson' | ||
| + | extend the consideration to the $\text{SL}_2(\mathbb Z)$-lattice in the hyperbolic plane. . | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **October 20**\\ | ||
| + | dimensional associative algebra over a field k to be self-injective and | ||
| + | then I will present newly discovered results for the computational | ||
| + | verification of when an algebra is self-injective. These are of interest | ||
| + | both for computer algebra and for establishing bounds on certain invariants | ||
| + | for an algebra. Some examples of these methods applied to centralizer | ||
| + | algebras will also be included. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **October 27**\\ | ||
| + | nilpotent. We combine these to show that for any finite group $G$ and $1> | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **November 3**\\ < | ||
| + | distributive variety is dualizable if and only if it has a near unanimity | ||
| + | term operation. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **November 10**\\ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **November 17**\\ | ||
| + | growth of a residually finite group, which measures how well a group is | ||
| + | approximated by its finite quotients. I will introduce this recently | ||
| + | developed invariant and give examples for certain groups. I will then focus | ||
| + | on linear groups, for which the normal and non-normal residual finiteness | ||
| + | growth functions are polynomial. Specifically, | ||
| + | asymptotics for these growth functions for Chevalley groups over rings of | ||
| + | integers in both characteristic 0 and p, which are polynomial of degree the | ||
| + | dimension of the group and the codimension of a maximal parabolic subgroup, | ||
| + | respectively. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **November 24**\\ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **December 1**\\ < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **December 8**\\ < | ||
| + | modular arithmetic type argument, but this will be a proof that involves | ||
| + | the quaternions. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **December 15**\\ | ||
| + | </ | ||
