seminars:datasci:120523
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| seminars:datasci:120523 [2023/12/04 19:04] – gfu | seminars:datasci:120523 [2023/12/04 19:05] (current) – gfu | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | <WRAP centeralign>## | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Date: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 | ||
| + | * Time: 12:00pm -- 1:00pm | ||
| + | * Room: Zoom | ||
| + | * Speaker: Dr. Xuexia Wang (Florida International University) | ||
| + | * Title: Genetic Association Test and Risk Prediction Modeling for Cardiomyopathy in Cancer Survivors. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center box 80%> | ||
| + | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| + | \\ This talk includes two recent studies. Study 1 is a methodology work: Gene-based association | ||
| + | tests are widely used in Genome-wide Association Studies (GWAS). The power of a test is often limited by | ||
| + | the sample size, the effect size, and the number of causal genetic variants or their directions in a gene. In addition, access to individual-level data is often limited. To resolve the existing limitations, | ||
| + | proved that aggregating the variants in one gene is the same as using the weighted combination of Z- | ||
| + | scores for each variant based on the proposed score test. Several popular methods are its special cases. | ||
| + | We also numerically illustrated that the proposed test outperforms comparsion methods via simulation | ||
| + | studies. Furthermore, | ||
| + | to demonstrate that our method outperforms comparsion methods in real data analyses. Study 2 is an | ||
| + | application work: We used a carefully curated list of 87 previously published genetic variants to determine | ||
| + | whether incorporation of genetic variants with non-genetic variables could improve identification of cancer | ||
| + | survivors at risk for anthracycline-related cardiomyopathy. We used anthracycline-exposed childhood | ||
| + | cancer survivors from a Children’s Oncology Group study (COG-ALTE03N1: | ||
| + | controls) as the discovery set. Replication was performed in two anthracycline-exposed survivor | ||
| + | populations: | ||
| + | 250 controls); ii) autologous blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) survivors from the BMT Survivor Study | ||
| + | (BMTSS: 80 cases; 78 controls). The Clinical+Genetic Model performed better than the Clinical Model in | ||
| + | COG-ALTE03N1 (AUC of Clinical+Genetic Model = 0.88 vs. AUC of Clinical Model = 0.81) and BMTSS (AUC | ||
| + | of Clinical+Genetic Model = 0.72 vs. AUC of Clinical Model = 0.64), but not in CCSS (AUC of | ||
| + | Clinical+Genetic Model = 0.88 vs. AUC of Clinical Model = 0.89). However, the Clinical+Genetic model | ||
| + | performed marginally better in CCSS patients without cardiovascular risk ractors where cardiomyopathy | ||
| + | developed within 30 years of anthracycline exposure (AUC of Clinical+Genetic Model = 0.90 vs. AUC of | ||
| + | Clinical Model = 0.85). Conclusions: | ||
| + | characteristics improves identification of cancer survivors at risk for anthracycline-related cardiomyopathy. | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Biography of the speaker: Dr. Wang is Professor of Biostatistics at the Florida International | ||
| + | University and Professor (Adjunct) of Biostatistics in the School of Medicine at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. She has extensive experience in designing a study based on a specific research goal, | ||
| + | providing protocol to collect sample data, performing quality control of a big dataset, supervising postdocs | ||
| + | or graduate students in methods development and data analysis, interpreting the study findings. In the past | ||
| + | 10 years, she has worked with a number of principal investigators in grant applications by proposing study | ||
| + | design, power estimation, methods, and procedures for data analysis. Dr. Wang has led data analysis for | ||
| + | numerous projects in cancer etiology and treatment-related adverse outcomes ranging from candidate | ||
| + | gene, genome-wide association study, to next-generation sequencing data analysis. In addition, she has | ||
| + | developed many powerful statistical methods and computational tools in genetic association studies which | ||
| + | contribute to the identification of the genetic susceptibility to complex diseases. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
