User Tools

Site Tools


seminars:datasci:120523

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
seminars:datasci:120523 [2023/12/04 19:04] gfuseminars:datasci:120523 [2023/12/04 19:05] (current) gfu
Line 1: Line 1:
 +<WRAP centeralign>##Data Science Seminar##\\ Hosted by the Department of Mathematics and Statistics</WRAP>
 +
 +  * Date: Tuesday, December 5, 2023
 +  * Time: 12:00pm -- 1:00pm
 +  * Room: Zoom
 +  * Speaker: Dr. Xuexia Wang (Florida International University)
 +  * Title: Genetic Association Test and Risk Prediction Modeling for Cardiomyopathy in Cancer Survivors.
 +
 +<WRAP center box 80%>
 +<WRAP centeralign>**//Abstract//**</WRAP>
 + \\ This talk includes two recent studies. Study 1 is a methodology work: Gene-based association
 +tests are widely used in Genome-wide Association Studies (GWAS). The power of a test is often limited by
 +the sample size, the effect size, and the number of causal genetic variants or their directions in a gene. In addition, access to individual-level data is often limited. To resolve the existing limitations, we proposed an optimally weighted combination (OWC) test based on summary statistics from GWAS. We analytically
 +proved that aggregating the variants in one gene is the same as using the weighted combination of Z-
 +scores for each variant based on the proposed score test. Several popular methods are its special cases.
 +We also numerically illustrated that the proposed test outperforms comparsion methods via simulation
 +studies. Furthermore, we utilized schizophrenia GWAS data and fasting glucose GWAS meta-analysis data
 +to demonstrate that our method outperforms comparsion methods in real data analyses. Study 2 is an
 +application work: We used a carefully curated list of 87 previously published genetic variants to determine
 +whether incorporation of genetic variants with non-genetic variables could improve identification of cancer
 +survivors at risk for anthracycline-related cardiomyopathy. We used anthracycline-exposed childhood
 +cancer survivors from a Children’s Oncology Group study (COG-ALTE03N1: 146 cases; 195 matched
 +controls) as the discovery set. Replication was performed in two anthracycline-exposed survivor
 +populations: i) childhood cancer survivors from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS: 126 cases;
 +250 controls); ii) autologous blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) survivors from the BMT Survivor Study
 +(BMTSS: 80 cases; 78 controls). The Clinical+Genetic Model performed better than the Clinical Model in
 +COG-ALTE03N1 (AUC of Clinical+Genetic Model = 0.88 vs. AUC of Clinical Model = 0.81) and BMTSS (AUC
 +of Clinical+Genetic Model = 0.72 vs. AUC of Clinical Model = 0.64), but not in CCSS (AUC of
 +Clinical+Genetic Model = 0.88 vs. AUC of Clinical Model = 0.89). However, the Clinical+Genetic model
 +performed marginally better in CCSS patients without cardiovascular risk ractors where cardiomyopathy
 +developed within 30 years of anthracycline exposure (AUC of Clinical+Genetic Model = 0.90 vs. AUC of
 +Clinical Model = 0.85). Conclusions: Adding a comprehensively assembled genetic profile to clinical
 +characteristics improves identification of cancer survivors at risk for anthracycline-related cardiomyopathy.
 + \\
 +
 +\\
 +
 +Biography of the speaker: Dr. Wang is Professor of Biostatistics at the Florida International
 +University and Professor (Adjunct) of Biostatistics in the School of Medicine at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. She has extensive experience in designing a study based on a specific research goal,
 +providing protocol to collect sample data, performing quality control of a big dataset, supervising postdocs
 +or graduate students in methods development and data analysis, interpreting the study findings. In the past
 +10 years, she has worked with a number of principal investigators in grant applications by proposing study
 +design, power estimation, methods, and procedures for data analysis. Dr. Wang has led data analysis for
 +numerous projects in cancer etiology and treatment-related adverse outcomes ranging from candidate
 +gene, genome-wide association study, to next-generation sequencing data analysis. In addition, she has
 +developed many powerful statistical methods and computational tools in genetic association studies which
 +contribute to the identification of the genetic susceptibility to complex diseases.
 +</WRAP>
 +