User Tools

Site Tools


seminars:stat:170831

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
seminars:stat:170831 [2017/09/01 18:18] qiaoseminars:stat:170831 [2017/09/01 18:21] (current) qiao
Line 1: Line 1:
 +<WRAP centeralign>##Statistics Seminar##\\ Department of Mathematical Sciences</WRAP>
 +
 +~~META:title =August 31, 2017~~
 +<WRAP 70% center>
 +^  **DATE:**|Thursday, August 31, 2017 |
 +^  **TIME:**|1.15p-2.15p |
 +^  **LOCATION:**|WH 100E |
 +^  **SPEAKER:**|Qiqing Yu, Binghamton University |
 +^  **TITLE:**|The Marginal Distribution Approach For Testing Independence And Goodness-of-fit In Linear Models  |
 +</WRAP>
 +\\ 
 +
 +<WRAP center box 80%>
 +<WRAP centeralign>**Abstract**</WRAP>
 +We propose a test to simultaneously test the assumption of independence and goodness-of-fit for a linear regression model $Y=\beta X+W$, where $\beta\in R^p$. If $E(|Y||X)=\infty$, then all existing tests are not valid and their levels
 +with a nominal size $0.05$ can be as large as $0.9$. Our approach is valid even if $E(|Y||X)=\infty$ or $E(||X||)=\infty$. Thus it is more realistic than all the existing tests. Our approach is based on the difference between two estimators of the marginal distribution $F_Y$, and thus it is called the MD approach.
 +We establish the consistency of the MD test. We compare the MD approach to the existing tests such as
 +the test in R package``gam" or the test in Sen and Sen (2014)  through simulation studies.
 +If the existing tests are valid, then none of the existing tests and the MD test is uniformly more powerful than the other. We apply the MD  approach to 3 real data sets.
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +
 +
 +