User Tools

Site Tools


seminars:stat:mar212024

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
seminars:stat:mar212024 [2024/03/15 22:45] qyuseminars:stat:mar212024 [2024/03/21 14:26] (current) qyu
Line 1: Line 1:
 +<WRAP centeralign>##Statistics Seminar##\\ Department of Mathematics and Statistics</WRAP>
 +
 +<WRAP 70% center>
 +^  **DATE:**|Thursday, March 21, 2024 |
 +^  **TIME:**|1:15pm -- 2:15pm |
 +^  **LOCATION:**|WH 100E |
 +^  **SPEAKER:**|Jingze Liu, Binghamton University |
 +^  **TITLE:**|Continuous Treatment Effect Estimation via Generative Adversarial De-confounding  |
 +</WRAP>
 +\\ 
 +
 +<WRAP center box 80%>
 +<WRAP centeralign>**Abstract**</WRAP>
 +One fundamental problem in causal inference is the treatment 
 +effect estimation in obser- vational studies, and its key challenge is 
 +to handle the confounding bias induced by the associations between 
 +covariates and treatment variable. This paper study the prob- lem of 
 +effect estimation on continuous treatment from observational data, going 
 +beyond previous work on binary treatments. Previous work for binary 
 +treatment focuses on de- confounding by balancing the distribution of 
 +covariates between the treated and control groups with either propensity 
 +score or confounder balancing techniques. In the continuous setting, 
 +those methods would fail as we can hardly evaluate the distribution of 
 +covariates under each treatment status. To tackle the case of continuous 
 +treatments, this paper propose a novel Generative Adversarial 
 +De-confounding (GAD) algorithm to eliminate the associa- tions between 
 +covariates and treatment variable with two main steps: (1) generating an 
 +“calibration” distribution without associations between covariates and 
 +treatment by ran- dom perturbation; (2) learning sample weight that 
 +transfer the distribution of observed data to the “calibration” 
 +distribution for de-confounding with a Generative Adversarial Network. 
 +Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets 
 +demonstrate that our algorithm outperforms the state-of-the-art methods 
 +for effect estimation of con- tinuous treatment with observational data.
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +
 +
 +